Transcript [00:00] Candace Owens has come out with this new [00:02] documentary about Erica Kirk, Bride of [00:06] Charlie, where she's going to expose the [00:07] real dark side of this of this shady [00:10] character, the widow of Charlie Kirk, [00:12] with all of her innuendo implying all [00:14] kinds of things about Erica and the [00:16] death of her husband. Look, she's [00:21] Candace is the queen of innuendo. If you [00:24] haven't seen the video about what she's [00:26] implying about me, go ahead and and find [00:28] that on the channel here, the, you know, [00:30] the whole Candace Owens conspiracy [00:32] theory world is quite a rabbit hole to [00:34] go down. But after she announced this [00:37] docu series exposing the real Erica [00:40] Kirk, Matt Walsh decided to respond. So, [00:42] let's have a look at what Matt had to [00:44] say. Any evidence that is based entirely [00:47] on unverified tips and unverified claims [00:50] from random sources cannot actually be [00:52] taken on its own as evidence of [00:53] anything. There are just too many other [00:55] potential reasons why these parties may [00:59] be involving themselves. [01:02] But I've already explained in detail why [01:03] I think Tyler Robinson did in fact kill [01:05] Charlie Kirk. Not at the best of TPUSA [01:08] or any foreign government or our own [01:09] government, but instead moved by his own [01:11] left-wing protrans radicalism. Trans [01:15] radicals are murdering people in this [01:18] country constantly. There is nothing at [01:19] all surprising or implausible about the [01:22] idea that they also killed Charlie Kirk. [01:24] And you can go back and watch that [01:26] episode to hear that case laid out. I [01:28] hope you do if you haven't seen it. [01:31] Today, I want to focus instead on the [01:34] increasingly aggressive and [01:35] single-minded attacks on Erica Kirk [01:38] specifically. As you may have seen, last [01:40] night Candace debuted a new series [01:43] called The Bride of Charlie, which [01:45] purports to tell us the sinister truth [01:47] about Erica. This, of course, didn't [01:49] come out of nowhere for weeks. Now, [01:50] Candace has openly suggested that Erica [01:52] may have committed a crime in connection [01:54] with her husband's murder. for example, [01:56] uh here she was a couple of weeks ago [01:58] stating that the police should detain [01:59] Erica and subject her to interrogation. [02:02] Watch. [02:04] >> Look, I have seen enough, ladies and [02:06] gentlemen. I've seen enough. Erica Kirk [02:09] should be dragged into a police precinct [02:11] for questioning. Like I said, uh you can [02:14] show me the person who disagrees with me [02:15] on that after I will reveal to you what [02:19] we can now confirm. You can show me that [02:21] individual and I will show you a full [02:24] bro blown fraud. That's that's the only [02:26] people that would disagree with that [02:27] assessment. [02:31] Well, but as we'll see, there isn't [02:32] enough evidence to justify dragging her [02:34] into a police precinct, much less [02:36] charging her with a crime, much less [02:38] convicting her. There isn't any [02:41] evidence, actual positive evidence, that [02:43] Erica has committed any crime or covered [02:45] up any crime or had any involvement in [02:48] any crime to include especially the [02:50] crime of murdering her husband. And [02:52] that's why although the innuendos about [02:54] Erica may be compelling fodder for [02:55] YouTube videos, they would not be [02:58] compelling to a grand jury or a [03:00] prosecutor or a judge. If you took [03:02] everything that's been said about Erica [03:04] or implied and tried to present it as [03:07] evidence in a court of law, you would be [03:10] laughed out of the room, there's no case [03:12] here. There's no evidence of anything. [03:16] Now, these attacks on Erica, by Candace, [03:18] and by everyone else engaged in this [03:19] campaign are wrong. Deeply, desperately [03:24] wrong. Wrong morally and factually. They [03:28] are wrong morally because they are wrong [03:32] factually. [03:33] The whole crux of the matter here is not [03:36] just that Erica is a grieving widow, but [03:39] that she is innocent of the accusations [03:41] that are being made or implied against [03:44] her. The point is not that, hey, Erica [03:47] may have killed her husband or been [03:48] involved in it or covered it up, but we [03:50] should take it easy on her because she's [03:51] a grieving widow. [03:53] The point is that Erica didn't do any of [03:56] that. There is no evidence that she did [03:58] any of that. No evidence at all. Period. [04:02] Defaming anybody with untrue accusations [04:04] is is very bad. But defaming a widow, [04:06] the grieving wife of a man that we all [04:07] say we loved and admired is unspeakably [04:11] horrifically bad. [04:14] Any evidence. Sorry. [04:17] Look, [laughter] [04:19] there's nothing new in this clip, you [04:21] know, that Candace Owens is a conspiracy [04:23] theorist. But what I found interesting [04:25] was what he said at the beginning where [04:26] he was talking about the fact that hey [04:30] radical trans activists have committed a [04:32] lot of violent crimes. They've committed [04:35] quite a number of murders and people on [04:39] the right have been warning about this [04:41] and pointing to it. Manifestos by trans [04:44] shooters became almost like a regular [04:46] thing over the course of the last couple [04:48] of years. And and that raises the issue [04:52] that hey, who killed Charlie Kirk? [04:56] There's such a thing as AAM's razor, [04:58] right? Which is that the you just kind [05:00] of look at the most likely [05:04] solution, the most likely uh [05:07] explanation, and that's actually [05:09] probably [05:11] that's probably what happened. In any [05:12] event, uh it reminded me of something [05:14] that Douglas Murray said on this topic [05:18] relating to the conspiracy theories [05:20] about the Israelis being involved, which [05:22] Candace has also trafficked in. She has [05:24] also pointed in that direction. That's [05:26] where talking about me has come up. I've [05:28] come up in her podcast apparently uh [05:31] numerous times. I know about two recent [05:33] segments and I did a video, that's the [05:35] video I was talking about. I did a video [05:36] about uh about Candace and what she said [05:40] about me and that was and she had she [05:42] had mentioned me a number of times [05:43] because I'm this rabbi from Israel who [05:45] spoke to Charlie before he was killed so [05:47] therefore I must have something to do [05:48] with it which is again similar innuendo [05:52] but on the the conspiracy theory on the [05:54] right about Israel's involvement uh [05:57] Douglas Murray had uh had some had uh [06:00] some excellent comments here so I wanted [06:02] to bring those up with with you. Here we [06:06] go. [06:08] Here's Douglas Murray. [06:10] >> Um, in the case of of people using the [06:13] murder of Charlie Kirk, um, and spinning [06:17] it into this conspiracy, I'm afraid it [06:19] plays to the same base uh, base [06:22] instincts and conspiracies and much [06:25] more. And by the way, as I mentioned in [06:27] the New York Post the other day, there's [06:29] two particularly interesting aspects to [06:31] that. there's a sort of question [06:32] underneath the motives of the people [06:35] trying to spin that. The first one is um [06:38] notice that although Charlie Kirk said [06:41] many critical things in his life I think [06:43] rightly uh had the certainly had the [06:45] right to do so about Islamic [06:48] fundamentals about some of the [06:49] fundamentals of Islam. Weirdly none of [06:52] these figures on the sort of [06:53] conspiratorial right in America have [06:55] claimed that it was the Muslims who did [06:57] it. That's quite interesting because [06:59] it's always interesting to see which [07:01] conspiracy theory uh people are going to [07:04] fall into. But the second thing that's [07:06] much more striking to me is this, if I [07:08] can say so quickly, which is [07:10] >> imagine imagine how strange it is [07:13] >> that again I mean the the trial is [07:16] forthcoming of of the alleged assassin, [07:18] but imagine how strange it is that [07:21] people on the on the political right in [07:22] America who have warned in recent years [07:25] about the transgender movement, who've [07:28] warned about uh handing out cross- sex [07:31] hormones which have a major effect on [07:33] people's brains, and as well as on on on [07:36] their physique and much more. Imagine [07:38] the people who've warned about that who [07:40] who've been saying for years, look, [07:42] there are two sexes and anyone who [07:45] claims there's a million different [07:46] genders. This is just weird crazy cuckoo [07:49] stuff and we've got to wake people up to [07:51] it. Imagine for those people, you [07:53] actually have an alleged shooter whose [07:56] partner appears to have been [07:58] transitioning and who texts to his [08:00] partner after the shooting. um you know [08:03] we can't there's no negotiation with [08:06] some type of hate and Charlie is shot in [08:08] the throat whilst answering a question [08:10] about transgender shooters. What more um [08:14] uh I don't want to say perfect but but [08:16] but what more sort of useful in a way [08:20] thing if you were thinking in those [08:21] terms and you were you were pushing a [08:23] particular set of ideas what would be [08:26] more useful to your cause and to say [08:27] look we've been talking about this for [08:29] all this time and now somebody has been [08:31] shot for raising these questions by [08:34] somebody in a relationship etc etc [08:37] Imagine in that situation do they decide [08:40] I'm actually going to push push aside [08:42] the facts even though they could be [08:45] useful to some of the arguments I make [08:47] because I would rather blame the Jews [08:51] that [08:51] >> Yeah. But you know why? You know why? It [08:54] works better. If the numbers on the [08:58] bottom of the thumbnail are not big [09:01] enough to justify the profits you want [09:04] and to keep you in the mix with the [09:07] names that are populating the trending [09:09] hashtags, [09:11] >> then you're not going to say it. And the [09:13] Jews resonate with division. And the [09:18] trans don't. They are a belleaguered [09:21] minority. And there are plenty of [09:23] conversations to have around the process [09:25] and the age and the acceptance and all [09:27] of it. But all I know about the facts in [09:29] this situation is that you had this POS [09:32] that pulled the trigger and it was the [09:35] alleged trans person in those texts who [09:38] was reasonably shocked by what he had [09:42] done and why and was questioning him [09:45] about it. Uh it was, you know, it was [09:47] the non-trans in that equation that was [09:49] the one who was acting crazy. But [09:52] >> they [09:54] >> all right. Um, [09:58] so you see the point that Douglas Murray [09:59] was making there and and I think that [10:01] that's really everything, which is [10:05] that here you have a situation where the [10:08] political right has been warning about [10:10] trans violence. It's been warning about [10:13] people uh committing attacks like this. [10:16] And then a guy who's in a relation, [10:18] someone who's in a relationship with [10:19] someone who's trans, [10:22] who is anti- Charlie Kirk because of [10:25] Charlie's anti-trans comments, shoots [10:28] Charlie while he's answering a question [10:31] about the trans issue. [10:34] And the political right, it it seems, as [10:37] Douglas Marie saying, like this plays [10:38] right into the narrative that you've [10:40] been speaking about. And yet you blame [10:43] the Jews with no evidence. [10:46] You know, so, uh, this really speaks to, [10:49] you know, what Candice is all about. As [10:52] Chris Cuomo correctly pointed out, [10:53] there's a reason they do it because it [10:55] works for clicks. If you go into Twitter [10:57] and you look at some of these accounts [10:59] that have turned against Israel [11:00] recently, I did this with Matt Gates's [11:02] account, look at Marjgery Taylor Green's [11:04] account, look at their posts about [11:05] issues that have nothing to do with [11:07] Israel or Jews, and then look at their [11:09] posts that are about Israel and Jews, [11:11] and look at the difference in [11:12] engagement. It pays the bills. Would [11:15] anyone be talking about Candace Owens? [11:17] Would Candace Owens be nearly as widely [11:19] listened to if she didn't say [11:21] inflammatory, outrageous, insane things? [11:24] So, it's good for business to engage in [11:26] conspiracy theories about the Jews and [11:30] to engage in conspiracy theories about [11:31] Charlie Kirk's wife, Erica, his widow, [11:34] Erica. This is uh this is where the [11:37] Candace Owens world is at. And thank God [11:40] we're seeing more and more voices on the [11:43] right, people like Matt Walsh who are [11:44] rising up and speaking out against it. [11:47] All right, folks. That's it for this [11:49] one. Uh I hope you have a great weekend [11:52] and uh please keep watching and sharing [11:55] and telling everyone about what we're [11:57] doing on this channel. And please make [11:59] sure to check out all the great content [12:00] we're putting up at Israel 365 News [12:02] YouTube channel. God bless.
